A major legal challenge was filed in the Bombay High Court on Sept. 11 against the Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Act, 2026, arguing that the new legislation overreaches by infringing constitutionally guaranteed rights to privacy, dignity, and personal autonomy. 

The comprehensive petition filed by a 70-year-old Islamic scholar against the Maharashtra legislation has injected fresh hope into a severely embattled Christian community, with Christian leaders and legal observers widely lauding this rare interfaith legal alignment and acknowledging that the law threatens all minority communities equally. 

The lawsuit argues that while the state may legally block coercive conversions, the new law functions as an overbroad mechanism of state surveillance. 

Escalating Persecution 

The legal battle unfolds against a backdrop of escalating, severe anti-Christian persecution across the state of Maharashtra, which recently became the 13th in India to enact the draconian anti-conversion legislation. 

Watchdog groups have documented a frightening surge in targeted hostility, including Hindu nationalist mobs brutally beating believers and destroying the homes of families who refuse to renounce Jesus Christ. 

Just recently, local authorities allegedly razed an independent church structure in Satara district of the state. Christian activists point out that civic bodies are increasingly utilizing administrative maneuvers to target prayer houses amid the heightened anti-Christian climate fueled by the new law. 

Compounding this hostility, the state government ordered an expansive audit into properties and land owned by churches and Christian missions. Church leaders and organizations have warned that these actions, combined with the new legislation, are part of a coordinated effort to paralyze Christian ministries, healthcare centers, and educational institutes. 

The Law as a Weapon 

The sections of the Maharashtra anti-conversion law heavily criminalize traditional expressions of Christian faith. Under the law’s overly broad definition of “allurement,” ordinary acts of charity, social welfare, and praying for the sick — allegedly under the guise of promising “divine healing” or a “better lifestyle” — can lead to a 10-year prison sentence. 

Furthermore, the law upends basic justice by reversing the burden of proof, treating the person sharing the Gospel as guilty until they can prove the convert acted voluntarily. 

To safeguard their flocks from malicious police raids, roughly 4,000 churches across Mumbai are currently forcing congregants to sign “self-declaration forms” before entering Sunday pews. These written affidavits, certifying that attendees are worshipping entirely of their own free will, are being stockpiled as emergency legal shields. 

Critics, though, observed that these self-declaration signatures are knee-jerk reactions that will not stand scrutiny or protect against attacks by fanatics. 

Constitutional Scrutiny 

According to media reports, the petition by the Islamic scholar follows the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court’s dismissal of an earlier challenge to the legislation on Aug. 21, citing deficiencies in the pleadings.  

The latest challenge brings the Maharashtra legislation directly under constitutional scrutiny, particularly on the extent to which the state can regulate religious conversion without infringing individual liberty, privacy and freedom of conscience. 

The proceedings could have wider implications for interpreting and implementing Maharashtra’s new anti-conversion framework, especially provisions on consent, disclosure requirements, alleged inducement, and the evidentiary burden in criminal proceedings. 

To read more news stories, visit the ICC Newsroom. For interviews, please email us. To support ICC’s work around the world, please give to our Where Most Needed Fund.