A recent directive from Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim concerning unauthorised places of worship has sent ripples through the country’s diverse religious landscape.

The Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism, and Taoism (MCCBCHST) is urging the prime minister to clarify how the “clean-up” initiative will be implemented, particularly for historical sites.

For Christians and churches across Malaysia, this directive could usher in a challenging period, potentially leading to persecution if houses of worship are not formally registered.

On Feb. 9, Ibrahim issued a statement calling for local councils to address unauthorised places of worship “in accordance with the law.” While the intention might be to streamline urban planning and legal compliance, the MCCBCHST quickly highlighted a critical nuance: many non-Muslim places of worship were established long before modern land codes or local councils existed during the colonial era.

The interfaith body, represented by leaders such as President Venerable Seck Chaio Ying and Deputy President Bishop Dr T Jeyakumar, raised several key points:

They questioned whether the directive would protect historic places of worship that predate Malaysia’s independence. MCCBCHST cited precedents such as Selangor’s 2008 guidelines, which state that places of worship over 100 years old should remain and that demolitions should not occur without consultation and suitable relocation alternatives. The council called for a review of restrictive land allocation policies that often deny non-Muslim houses of worship lawful land access.

Why This Matters for Malaysian Christians and Churches

The core concern revolves around the enforcement mechanism. For Christians in Malaysia, many churches operate in spaces not purpose-built for worship, and a broad application of the directive could have severe repercussions.

Many churches, especially in urban areas, utilize shop or factory lots for their services due to practicality and location constraints, not necessarily land ownership.

Bahasa-speaking churches in Orang Asli villages often meet in pastors’ houses. These spaces are vital religious and social hubs, deeply intertwined with community life and cultural identity. If these unregistered or informally established places of worship are targeted without careful consideration, it could disrupt worship, religious education, and pastoral outreach. Crucially, the lack of formal registration could be used as a basis for legal action, potentially leading to the closure of churches, displacement of congregations, and the prosecution of church leaders – a form of persecution that directly impacts religious freedom.

MCCBCHST advocates for a clear, compassionate, and legally sound approach. And clarification on whether historic places of worship are exempt from blanket enforcement. In addition:

• Confirmation that existing protections (like the 2008 Selangor policy) for historic sites will be applied nationwide, along with a clear definition of what constitutes a “suitable alternative site.”
• A review of land allocation policies to ensure non-Muslim places of worship have fair and lawful access to land. Reducing unauthorised construction while safeguarding the right to worship and ensuring equitable treatment for all faiths. Expect increased scrutiny on occupancy, land use, and building compliance. This could range from requiring new permits and licenses to more complex processes like relocation or formalization. Without proper registration, these churches risk immediate closure.
• Enforcement actions for Orang Asli Village Churches demand extreme sensitivity. These spaces are integral to local ministry and community life. Any move without dialogue could destabilize communities and trigger tensions. The informal nature of these spaces, often not recognized as official places of worship, puts them at high risk of being deemed “unauthorised” and subject to enforcement.

The overarching concern for the Christian community is the potential for persecution. If the directive is applied rigidly, without distinguishing between deliberately illegal structures and long-standing, community-serving places of worship that simply lack formal registration, churches could face legal battles, fines, and forced closures. This would be a direct challenge to religious freedom.

This directive highlights religious freedom, land policy, and community identity in Malaysia. MCCBCHST’s call for clarity is a crucial step to prevent blanket actions that could unfairly target historic or community-established faith spaces.

For Christians, the coming months will be critical to advocate for clear guidelines, engage in constructive dialogue, and safeguard the fundamental right to worship without fear of persecution due to unregistered status. The principle that depiction is not endorsement is paramount, and ensuring lawful, respectful, and socially responsible worship spaces is a shared responsibility.

To read more news stories, visit the ICC Newsroom. For interviews, please email [email protected]. To support ICC’s work around the world, please give to our Where Most Needed Fund.