Note: ICC is an apolitical entity and does not support political causes or parties. ICC’s focus is to ease the suffering of Christians in hostile places. 

By ICC Fellow Lisa Navarrette 

While support for and opinions on President Trump range widely among believers, he and his administration have prioritized international religious freedom and helping persecuted Christians.  

This elevated the issue from a secondary diplomatic concern to a visible component of U.S. foreign policy. This shift represented a meaningful step toward confronting the widespread persecution of Christians worldwide. 

One defining initiative of the current administration was the launch of the Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom, held for the first time in 2018. This gathering brought together government officials, faith leaders, and human rights advocates from around the world to address religious persecution in a coordinated and public way. The administration created a global platform where issues such as anti-Christian violence, imprisonment for faith, and restrictions on religious practice could be openly discussed.(1) 

This initiative was significant not only for its scale but also for its symbolism. It signaled that the United States was willing to use its influence to prioritize religious liberty as a fundamental human right. The fundamental belief that it is an inalienable right has been present since the inception of the U.S. It was so important to the Founding Fathers that it is listed as the first right in the Bill of Rights. This is why the persecuted around the world look to the U.S. as a beacon of hope. 

This initiative gave greater visibility to the struggles of persecuted Christians. This brought hope to Christians worldwide who had previously received little attention on the global stage. For advocacy organizations and faith-based groups, this visibility translated into increased awareness, engagement, and new policy discussions. 

The Trump administration has also utilized economic and diplomatic tools to address human rights abuses. One of the most notable mechanisms was the expanded use of sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the U.S. government to target individuals responsible for serious human rights violations. Individual sanctions, such as asset freezes, visa bans, and direct accountability for perpetrators, have been used in China, Turkey, and Myanmar. Country-level sanctions such as broad economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and human rights enforcement have been widely used in Iran and North Korea. Sanctions send the message that such abuses carry tangible consequences.(2) 

These measures represented a shift from passive acknowledgment to active response. Rather than merely documenting persecution, the administration sought to impose costs on those responsible. Perpetrators often operate with impunity. Therefore, this approach is a tangible step toward accountability. 

Institutional frameworks dedicated to religious freedom have been strengthened. The administration worked closely with entities such as the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, which monitors and reports on violations worldwide.(3) Countries identified as severe violators were designated as “Countries of Particular Concern,” a classification that triggers diplomatic pressure and policy responses. This process helped formalize the identification of persecution hotspots and placed additional scrutiny on governments accused of failing to protect, or actively persecuting, religious minorities. 

The administration’s focus on religious freedom aligns with concerns about the survival of Christian communities in historically significant regions. In Iran and Syria, for example, decades of conflict and targeted violence have dramatically reduced Christian populations. The administration emphasized the urgency of preserving religious diversity and protecting vulnerable populations worldwide. 

Advocacy and awareness are critical components of change, but they do not always translate directly into immediate improvements. What creates change is swift, decisive action. On Christmas Day, the president announced that the U.S. had struck ISIS militants in Nigeria for targeting innocent Christians.(4) In a recent conference, Ambassador Brian Burch stated that “The president has said that Christians face an existential crisis in Nigeria and thanks to his leadership, he is now acting to bring an end to this. [President Trump] leads with the sword and shield of American power.”(5) 

The Trump administration, with its commitment to advancing religious freedom, heightened global attention for suffering Christians worldwide. Through diplomatic discourse, convening international leaders, and applying targeted sanctions, the U.S. administration has brought Christian persecution to international attention. The president has also demonstrated a willingness to use the authority of his presidency to promote accountability and consequences for those responsible. 

The administration’s emphasis on Christian persecution has encouraged discussions and actions about the role of governments, international organizations, and civil society in defending religious liberty. In a world where millions continue to face discrimination, violence, and displacement because of their faith, swift action remains both relevant and necessary. 

Sources 

1. https://2017-2021.state.gov/ministerial-to-advance-religious-freedom/ 
2. https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information 
3. https://www.uscirf.gov/ 
4. https://www.cfr.org/articles/dynamics-behind-trumps-decision-bomb-isis-nigeria 
5. https://ewtnvatican.com/articles/u-s-embassy-to-the-vatican-nigerian-christians-are-being-targeted 

To read more news stories, visit the ICC Newsroom. For interviews, please email [email protected]. To support ICC’s work around the world, please give to our Where Most Needed Fund.